Holly:
I'm
working on rulebooks right now. I have one going for Tiger Leader, and another
for Modern Land Battles. They take lots of time and effort, as any technical
manual ranging from 16 to 48 pages would. It's like writing a little book. Only
the characters MUST teach the reader something specific, and if I screw it up,
the players get grumpy. So, no pressure.
Happily,
Warfighter has been shipped out, to individuals and game store distributors. We
are getting player comments and feedback every day. I love that. Reading them
stresses me out, but when a particularly good one comes along, we all cheer.
I get
lots of "Wonderful rulebook, I completely understand the game." comments.
Yeah! I also get a few "The rulebook is not good" comments. Less fun.
In the
middle, though, are the comments about the rulebook layout, or order of
information being difficult to understand. I take that very seriously. I am
always looking for the perfect balance of when to introduce something and how
to explain it. I look at any rulebook I can get my hands on, to see how other
companies do it.
There
are a few techniques to choose from…
1) Introduce
and explain all the components, then teach the rules of the game that will be
using those components.
Pro: Readers
have seen all the components and generally know what they do, before they have
to use them.
Con: It
takes so long to learn all the parts, the game feels heavy and boring.
2)
Chronological. Introduce components while teaching the rules. The reader only
needs to learn about a component connected to "this rule, right now."
Pro:
Learning "As Needed". You don't have to hold on to knowledge, waiting
for an explanation later.
Con: Not
being able to see the Big Picture until you have finished reading the whole
rulebook.
3) Start
with the rules, with the component descriptions in the back of the rulebook.
Pro: It
gets the game started quickly, and anything you need to know about, you - the
reader - can look up in the back.
Con: The
reader gets a feeling of being lost, while needing to reference the back, over
and over.
Do you -
the reader of this Blog, the reader of these rulebooks - have a preference? I'm
always interested in comments and feedback.
Kevin:
Thank
you for all of your help in posting reviews and spreading the word about
Warfighter! We really appreciate it, and all of this community involvement is
amazing. If you have an "AAR" (After Action Report), a review, or a
game play write up, be sure to post it on your preferred website, and let us
know. We'll include it in the next blog.
All the
support you've shown on Facebook, CSW, and BGG have really inspired us. We are
putting together plans to create a DVG Demo Leader program. The basic idea is
to match up people who like our games with their local game stores. We'll
provide demo copies of games and some kind of reward system to show our
appreciation for your efforts.
Thank
you again. Without your enthusiasm, none of this would be possible!
Hi Holly, I prefer option 2 since you can really start playing while learning the rules. So I think you are doing it the right way. ;)
ReplyDeleteI agree with Chris. I think the Warfighter rulebook is well organized and the rules well explained. I haven't had any rules problems. Generally, I've found DVG rulebooks to be quite good. I especially appreciate that they are well illustrated with bits of components from the games, and have lots of examples.
ReplyDelete